Card-Present vs Card-Not-Present Transactions
Networks distinguish transaction types by risk level, which directly affects interchange rates and fraud liability. Understanding this distinction is critical for pricing, risk management, and fraud prevention.
Card-Present (CP) Transactions
Card-present transactions occur when the physical card is presented at the point of sale, allowing for stronger authentication.
Definition
CARD-PRESENT: Physical card present during transaction, with direct verification of the card's authenticity.
Transaction Methods
EMV CHIP INSERTION (Most Secure):
- Card inserted into terminal
- Cryptographic authentication
- Dynamic data (changes per transaction)
- Extremely difficult to counterfeit
- Liability shift: Issuer bears fraud risk
CONTACTLESS/NFC TAP:
- Card tapped near terminal
- Uses NFC technology
- Same security as chip (EMV)
- Apple Pay, Google Pay, Samsung Pay
- Transaction limit (typically $100-250 without PIN)
MAGNETIC STRIPE SWIPE (Least Secure):
- Card swiped through reader
- Static data (same every time)
- Easy to counterfeit (skimming)
- Being phased out globally
- Liability shift: Merchant bears fraud risk if chip-capable card swiped
Characteristics
SECURITY ADVANTAGES:
- Physical card verified at point of sale
- Customer present (reduces fraud)
- EMV chip provides cryptographic authentication
- Real-time card validation
- Biometric authentication (for mobile wallets)
FRAUD RISK:
- Very low: 0.05% - 0.1% of transaction volume
- Counterfeit fraud nearly eliminated by EMV
- Lost/stolen card fraud still possible
- Contactless tap limits reduce exposure
INTERCHANGE RATES:
- Lower due to reduced fraud risk
- Typical range: 1.43% - 1.65% + $0.05-$0.10
CHARGEBACK DEFENSE:
- Stronger for merchants
- EMV liability shift protects merchants
- Card-present authorization proof
- Signature/PIN verification available
Card-Not-Present (CNP) Transactions
Card-not-present transactions occur when the physical card is not presented, requiring alternative verification methods.
Definition
CARD-NOT-PRESENT: Card not physically present during transaction; card details manually entered or stored.
Transaction Methods
E-COMMERCE (Online Checkout):
- Customer enters card details on website
- Most common CNP method
- Requires CVV, expiration date
- Often includes AVS (Address Verification)
- 3D Secure available for enhanced security
MOTO (Mail Order / Telephone Order):
- Customer provides card details by phone or mail
- Manual entry by merchant
- Higher risk than e-commerce
- Common in call centers
- Declining in usage
RECURRING BILLING:
- Card details stored for subscription
- No CVV required after initial setup
- Authorization obtained once, charged repeatedly
- Common for SaaS, memberships, utilities
IN-APP PURCHASES:
- Mobile app transactions
- Card stored in app or device
- Apple Pay, Google Pay reduce CNP classification
- Game purchases, subscriptions
Characteristics
SECURITY CHALLENGES:
- Card not physically verified
- Customer not physically present
- Relies on data elements (CVV, AVS)
- Easier to commit fraud
- Credential stuffing attacks
FRAUD RISK:
- Higher: 0.5% - 1.5% of transaction volume
- 10-15x higher than card-present
- Account takeover fraud
- Friendly fraud (illegitimate chargebacks)
- Testing stolen cards
INTERCHANGE RATES:
- Higher due to increased fraud risk
- Typical range: 1.80% - 2.95% + $0.10
- Premium cards even higher
CHARGEBACK DEFENSE:
- Weaker for merchants
- Customer can claim "card not present"
- Limited physical proof of transaction
- Delivery confirmation helps
- Digital goods hardest to defend
Fraud Mitigation for CNP
Because CNP transactions carry higher fraud risk, merchants must implement additional verification.
CVV/CVV2 Verification
WHAT IT IS:
- 3-4 digit code on back of card (Visa/MC/Discover) or front (Amex)
- Not stored in magnetic stripe or chip
- Proves physical card possession
HOW IT WORKS:
Customer enters: 123
Merchant sends to issuer: CVV=123
Issuer verifies: Match/No Match
Response: N (No Match), M (Match), P (Not Processed), U (Unavailable)
EFFECTIVENESS:
- Reduces fraud by ~30-40%
- Required for optimal interchange
- Cannot be stored after authorization (PCI violation)
LIMITATIONS:
- Stolen physical card = valid CVV
- Phishing can capture CVV
- Not required for recurring billing
AVS (Address Verification System)
WHAT IT IS:
- Compares billing address to address on file with issuer
- Checks numeric portions (street number, ZIP)
- US/Canada primarily
HOW IT WORKS:
Customer enters: 123 Main St, 12345
Merchant sends: Street=123, ZIP=12345
Issuer compares to cardholder address
Response: Y (Yes), N (No), A (Partial), etc.
RESPONSE CODES:
| Code | Meaning | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|
| Y | Street and ZIP match | Low |
| Z | ZIP matches, street doesn't | Medium |
| A | Street matches, ZIP doesn't | Medium |
| N | Neither matches | High |
| U | Address not available | Medium |
EFFECTIVENESS:
- Reduces fraud by ~20-30%
- Helps qualify for better interchange
- Useful for risk scoring
LIMITATIONS:
- Only works in US/Canada
- Legitimate customers may have old address on file
- Many issuers don't return full data
3D Secure (Verified by Visa, Mastercard SecureCode)
WHAT IT IS:
- Additional authentication step
- Customer redirected to bank for verification
- Password, SMS code, or biometric
- Shifts liability to issuer if used
VERSIONS:
3D Secure 1.0 (Legacy):
- Static passwords
- Popup window (poor UX)
- High abandonment rates (10-20%)
- Being phased out
3D Secure 2.0 (Current):
- Risk-based authentication
- Frictionless for low-risk transactions
- Biometric authentication (fingerprint, face)
- Mobile-optimized
- Required in EU (SCA/PSD2)
- Lower abandonment (2-5%)
LIABILITY SHIFT:
WITH 3D Secure (authenticated):
Chargeback liability → Issuer
WITHOUT 3D Secure:
Chargeback liability → Merchant
ADOPTION:
- EU: Mandatory for most transactions (PSD2/SCA)
- US: Optional, growing adoption
- High-risk merchants: Highly recommended
Additional Fraud Tools
DEVICE FINGERPRINTING:
- Identifies devices by browser/OS characteristics
- Detects multiple cards from same device
- Tracks velocity patterns
- Helps identify fraudsters
VELOCITY CHECKS:
- Limit transactions per card/customer
- Monitor rapid-fire authorizations
- Flag unusual patterns
- Prevent card testing
FRAUD SCORING:
- Machine learning models
- Analyzes 100+ data points
- Real-time risk scores
- Accept/review/decline decisions
EXAMPLE FRAUD RULES:
- Decline if CVV doesn't match
- Review if AVS = N (no match)
- Limit 3 transactions per card per day
- Block countries with high fraud rates
- Flag mismatched email/IP country
Interchange Rate Comparison
The difference in fraud risk translates directly to interchange costs.
2024-2025 Interchange Ranges
| Transaction Type | Typical Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CP - Debit (regulated) | 0.05% + $0.21 | Durbin cap (banks >$10B) |
| CP - Debit (unregulated) | 0.80% - 1.40% + $0.15 | Small banks exempt from Durbin |
| CP - Credit (standard) | 1.54% + $0.10 | Visa CPS Retail (2024) |
| CP - Credit (rewards) | 1.65% + $0.10 | Visa Signature Preferred |
| CNP - Credit (standard) | 1.80% + $0.10 | Base e-commerce rate |
| CNP - Credit (rewards) | 2.30% - 2.50% + $0.10 | Most consumer cards |
| CNP - Credit (premium) | 2.60% - 3.15% + $0.10 | World Elite/Infinite |
Interchange varies by 300+ categories. The above are representative examples. Actual rates depend on MCC, card type, processing method, and data provided (AVS match, Level 2/3 data, etc.).
Cost Impact Example
$100 TRANSACTION COMPARISON:
Card-Present (Chip):
Interchange: $1.54 (1.54% + $0.05)
Network fees: $0.19
Acquirer markup: $0.30
─────────────────────────
Total fees: $2.03
Merchant receives: $97.97
Card-Not-Present (E-commerce):
Interchange: $2.40 (2.30% + $0.10) [Rewards card]
Network fees: $0.21 (includes digital commerce fee)
Acquirer markup: $0.40
─────────────────────────
Total fees: $3.01
Merchant receives: $96.99
DIFFERENCE: CNP costs $0.98 more (48% higher) than CP on same card type
Interchange Qualification
To qualify for optimal CNP interchange rates, merchants must provide specific data.
Data Requirements for CNP
MINIMUM REQUIRED:
- Card number
- Expiration date
- Transaction amount
- Merchant category code
FOR STANDARD RATES:
- CVV/CVV2 match
- AVS response (at least partial match)
- Capture within 7 days of authorization
FOR OPTIMAL RATES:
- CVV match
- AVS full match (Y response)
- 3D Secure authentication
- Capture within 24 hours
- Level 2/3 data (for commercial cards)
DOWNGRADE TRIGGERS:
| Issue | Impact | Rate Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| No CVV | Downgrades to higher tier | +0.20% - 0.40% |
| AVS No Match (N) | Downgrades | +0.15% - 0.30% |
| Late capture (>7 days) | Downgrades | +0.30% - 0.50% |
| Missing data elements | Non-qualified rate | +0.50% - 1.00% |
Industry-Specific Considerations
E-Commerce Platforms
CHALLENGES:
- 100% CNP transactions
- Higher fraud rates
- Digital goods (no delivery proof)
- International customers
STRATEGIES:
- Implement 3D Secure 2.0
- Device fingerprinting
- Fraud scoring (Stripe Radar, Kount)
- Clear refund policies (reduce friendly fraud)
- Detailed product descriptions
TYPICAL COSTS:
- 2.5% - 3.5% all-in processing fees
- Higher for digital goods (3.5% - 4.5%)
Restaurants (Card-Present Dominant)
ADVANTAGES:
- Mostly card-present (chip/tap)
- Lower interchange (1.54% - 1.65%)
- EMV liability shift
CHALLENGES:
- Tip adjustments (post-authorization)
- Quick service (speed vs security)
TYPICAL COSTS:
- 1.9% - 2.5% all-in processing fees
Subscription/SaaS (Recurring CNP)
CHALLENGES:
- Card-on-file transactions
- No CVV after initial setup
- Higher friendly fraud ("I didn't authorize")
- Failed recurring charges
STRATEGIES:
- Initial 3D Secure authentication
- Account updater services (keep cards current)
- Clear subscription terms
- Cancellation flows
TYPICAL COSTS:
- 2.5% - 3.2% all-in processing fees
- Account updater: $0.05-$0.10 per card/month
Liability Shift: Who Bears Fraud Risk?
Understanding fraud liability is crucial for both merchants and PayFacs.
Card-Present Liability (EMV)
IF MERCHANT HAS EMV-CAPABLE TERMINAL:
- Chip card used → Issuer liable for counterfeit fraud
- Chip card swiped instead → Merchant liable
- Magnetic-only card → Issuer liable
IF MERCHANT DOES NOT HAVE EMV TERMINAL:
- Chip card presented → Merchant liable (should have upgraded)
- Magnetic card → Issuer liable
EXAMPLE:
Scenario: Counterfeit chip card used at merchant
- Merchant has EMV terminal, chip used: Issuer liable
- Merchant has EMV terminal, card swiped: Merchant liable
- Merchant has old swipe-only terminal: Merchant liable
Card-Not-Present Liability
STANDARD CNP (No 3D Secure):
- Fraudulent transaction → Merchant liable
- Merchant bears chargeback risk
- Must provide compelling evidence
WITH 3D SECURE:
- 3DS authenticated → Issuer liable
- Liability shift to issuer
- Merchant protected from fraud chargebacks
WITH CVV/AVS:
- Helps defend chargebacks but doesn't shift liability
- Merchant still ultimately liable
- Shows "reasonable effort" to verify
Optimizing for Card-Present
When possible, card-present transactions are preferable for lower costs and fraud.
Encouraging Card-Present
FOR RETAIL:
- Accept all contactless methods (Apple Pay, Google Pay)
- Fast checkout experience
- Clear payment terminal placement
- Train staff on EMV (don't allow swipe if chip works)
FOR OMNICHANNEL:
- Buy online, pick up in store (BOPIS)
- Process payment at pickup (card-present)
- Lower fraud, lower interchange
- Better customer experience
FOR SERVICE BUSINESSES:
- Mobile card readers (Square, SumUp)
- Process on-site rather than invoicing
- Immediate payment = better cash flow
Key Takeaways
-
CNP costs significantly more - 20-50% higher fees due to fraud risk and higher interchange
-
EMV shifted fraud online - As card-present fraud declined, CNP fraud increased (fraud migrates to weakest point)
-
3D Secure shifts liability - Authentication protects merchants from fraud chargebacks
-
Data quality affects rates - CVV, AVS, timely capture all impact interchange qualification
-
Industry matters - E-commerce platforms inherently pay more than in-person retail
Related Topics
Card Network Fundamentals:
- Card Network Role Overview - What card networks do
- Transaction Routing - How BIN routing works
Risk Management:
- Chargebacks and Disputes - Dispute process and defense
- Network Rules - Compliance requirements
Fee Optimization:
- Network Fees - Assessment and passthrough fees
- Interchange Optimization - Reducing processing costs
References
Official Network Documentation
- Visa Core Rules - CP vs CNP rules (Section 5)
- Mastercard Rules Manual - Transaction classification
- EMVCo Specifications - EMV chip standards
Security Standards
- PCI DSS Requirements - CVV storage prohibitions
- EMV 3D Secure - 3DS 2.0 specifications
- Visa 3D Secure Guide
Industry Analysis
- 2024 Nilson Report - Card Fraud - CNP fraud trends
- Javelin Strategy - Identity Fraud - CNP fraud statistics
- Visa Security Summit Reports - Fraud prevention best practices
Continue learning: Self-Assessment Quiz