Payment Processors
Last Updated: 2025-12-18
Status: Complete
Changes Log:
- 2025-12: Initial comprehensive notes with PayFac context and payment-critic review
Payment processors are the technical backbone of the card payment ecosystem. They provide the infrastructure that routes transactions between merchants, card networks, and banks. Understanding processors is essential for anyone building a PayFac platform.
Overview
A payment processor is a company that provides the technical infrastructure and services to move transaction data between merchants, card networks, and banks. Think of processors as the "plumbing" of the payment ecosystem.
| Function | Description |
|---|---|
| Technical Infrastructure | Network connectivity, transaction routing, PCI-compliant data handling |
| Business Services | Underwriting, fraud detection, chargeback management, reporting |
| Financial Services | Settlement coordination, reserve management, currency conversion |
Key Distinction: Most third-party processors are NOT banks and don't hold banking licenses to move money independently. They must partner with acquiring banks (sponsor banks for PayFacs) that hold regulatory licenses and settlement accounts. However, some major processors are bank-owned entities (Chase Paymentech, Elavon, Wells Fargo Merchant Services) with direct access to banking infrastructure.
What a Payment Processor Does
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| WHAT A PAYMENT PROCESSOR DOES |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE: |
| * Connects merchants to card networks (Visa, Mastercard, etc.) |
| * Routes authorization requests in milliseconds |
| * Batches and submits transactions for settlement |
| * Maintains PCI-compliant data security |
| * Provides APIs, SDKs, and terminals |
| |
| BUSINESS SERVICES: |
| * Merchant underwriting and onboarding |
| * Fraud detection and prevention |
| * Chargeback management |
| * Reporting and reconciliation |
| * Customer support |
| |
| FINANCIAL SERVICES: |
| * Settlement and funding coordination |
| * Reserve management |
| * Currency conversion (for multi-currency) |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Historical Evolution
The payment processing industry has evolved through distinct eras:
1950s-1970s: Manual Processing
- Merchants used manual imprinters ("knuckle busters")
- Made carbon copies of embossed cards
- Called issuers for voice authorization
- Mailed paper receipts to acquiring banks
- Settlement took weeks
- High error rates and fraud
1970s-1990s: Electronic Authorization Era
Key innovations:
- 1973: Visa develops VisaNet - first electronic authorization network
- 1975: Magnetic stripe cards standardized (ISO 7813)
- 1979: Electronic terminals replace manual imprinters
- 1980s: Point-of-sale (POS) networks proliferate
- 1987: ISO 8583 standard for transaction messages
Impact:
- Authorization: Weeks -> Seconds
- Settlement: Weeks -> Days (T+1 to T+3, modern processors offer T+0 or T+1 standard)
- Major players emerge: National Data Corporation (NDC), First Data Corporation (1971)
1990s-2000s: Internet Era & Consolidation
E-commerce revolution:
- 1994: First secure online transaction (Cybersource)
- 1998: PayPal founded (payment aggregator model)
- Late 1990s: Payment gateways emerge (Authorize.Net, CyberSource)
- Card-not-present (CNP) processing becomes significant
Industry consolidation:
- Banks acquire processors for "end-to-end" control
- Processors acquire competitors for scale
- 2002: Chase acquires Paymentech
- 2008: Worldpay spun out from RBS
2010s-Present: Fintech Disruption
New players emerge:
- 2006: Adyen founded - unified commerce
- 2009: Square founded - mobile payments for SMBs
- 2010: Stripe founded - developer-first payments
Mega-mergers (2019):
- Fiserv acquires First Data for $22B
- FIS acquires Worldpay for $43B
- Global Payments acquires TSYS for $21.5B
2024-2025 reshuffling:
- 2024: FIS sells 55% Worldpay stake to GTCR for $18.5B (implying ~$34B total valuation, down from $43B paid in 2019)
- April 2025 (announced, expected close Q4 2025/Q1 2026): Global Payments acquiring Worldpay for $22.7B
- April 2025 (announced, expected close 2025-2026): Global Payments selling TSYS/Issuer Solutions to FIS for $13.5B
Front-End vs Back-End Processing
Payment processing involves two distinct functions, often performed by different companies:
Front-End Processing (Authorization)
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| FRONT-END PROCESSING |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| FUNCTION: Real-time authorization routing and response |
| |
| RESPONSIBILITIES: |
| 1. Transaction Acceptance |
| - POS terminals, payment gateways, APIs |
| - Accept card swipe/dip/tap/keyed data |
| - Validate data format |
| |
| 2. Routing to Card Networks |
| - Identify card type from BIN |
| - Route to appropriate network (Visa/MC/Amex/Discover) |
| - Format message in ISO 8583 standard |
| |
| 3. Fraud Screening |
| - Real-time fraud checks (velocity, geolocation, BIN) |
| - AVS/CVV verification |
| - Machine learning models for risk scoring |
| |
| 4. Response Handling |
| - Receive approve/decline from issuer |
| - Return response to merchant |
| - Store authorization data for later settlement |
| |
| TIMING: Milliseconds to seconds |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Examples of Front-End Processors: Stripe, Adyen, Authorize.Net, Braintree
Back-End Processing (Settlement & Clearing)
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| BACK-END PROCESSING |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| FUNCTION: Batch settlement, clearing, and funding |
| |
| RESPONSIBILITIES: |
| 1. Batch Processing |
| - Collect day's authorized/captured transactions |
| - Sort by card network |
| - Create settlement files |
| |
| 2. Interchange Calculation |
| - Determine exact interchange rate for each transaction |
| - Based on: card type, MCC, entry mode, data quality |
| - Calculate network assessment fees |
| |
| 3. Clearing Submission |
| - Submit files to Visa, Mastercard, etc. |
| - Receive clearing responses |
| - Match settled transactions to authorizations |
| |
| 4. Settlement & Funding |
| - Calculate net positions |
| - Coordinate with acquiring bank |
| - Fund merchants (T+1 to T+3) |
| |
| TIMING: Daily batch cycles, overnight processing |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Examples of Back-End Processors: First Data (Fiserv), TSYS (now part of Global Payments)
Full-Stack vs Specialized Processors
| Type | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Full-Stack | Handle both front-end AND back-end | First Data (Fiserv), Worldpay, Global Payments, Chase Paymentech, Adyen |
| Front-End Only | Focus on merchant experience, outsource settlement | Authorize.Net, Many ISOs |
| Back-End Only | Infrastructure for front-end processors | Rare in modern market; FIS focusing here |
Technical Flow: Front-End to Back-End
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| TECHNICAL FLOW: FRONT-END -> BACK-END PROCESSING |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
PHASE 1: AUTHORIZATION (Front-End Processor)
============================================
Terminal/API Front-End Card Issuer
Processor Network
| | | |
| POST /charge | | |
|------------------>| | |
| | 1. Validate | |
| | 2. Tokenize | |
| | 3. Fraud check | |
| | | |
| | ISO 8583 message | |
| |------------------>|------------------>|
| | | |
| |<------------------|<------------------|
|<-------------------| APPROVED | |
| {auth_code: 1234} | | |
| | | |
| | Store auth data | |
| | in database for | |
| | later settlement | |
| | | |
PHASE 2: CAPTURE & SETTLEMENT (Hand-off to Back-End)
====================================================
Front-End Back-End Card Acquiring
Processor Processor Network Bank
| | | |
| End of day batch | | |
| (all captured txns) | | |
|------------------->| | |
| | | |
| | 1. Calculate | |
| | interchange | |
| | 2. Format | |
| | settlement | |
| | files | |
| | | |
| | Submit to network | |
| |------------------>| |
| | | |
| | | Clearing process |
| | | |
| | Funding | |
| | instructions | |
| |<------------------| |
| | | |
| | Request funds | |
| | from bank | |
| |---------------------------------------->|
| | | |
|<--------------------| Settlement report | |
| (for merchant) | | |
| | | |
How Processors Connect to Card Networks
Processors must be certified by card networks to route transactions. This is a multi-year, multi-million dollar process.
Direct Network Connections (Tier 1)
What it means:
- Processor has direct connection to Visa, Mastercard networks
- They are a "member" or "principal member" of the network
- Can submit both authorization and settlement messages
Requirements:
-
Network Certification
- Pass extensive technical testing
- Prove system reliability (99.9%+ uptime)
- Demonstrate PCI DSS Level 1 compliance
- Timeline: 12-24 months
-
Financial Requirements
- Sponsor bank relationship (if not a bank itself)
- Reserves/collateral (millions of dollars)
- Financial audit requirements
-
Ongoing Compliance
- Annual recertification
- Security audits (quarterly)
- Network rule updates (continuous)
Who has direct connections: First Data (Fiserv), Worldpay, Global Payments/TSYS, Chase Paymentech, Elavon, Adyen, Stripe
Gateway Connections (Tier 2/3)
What it means:
- Processor routes through ANOTHER processor's network connection
- They are a "gateway" or "third-party processor"
- Don't directly touch card networks
Merchant
|
v
+------------------+
| Payment Gateway | <-- Encrypts data
+------------------+
|
v
+------------------+
| Payment Processor| <-- Routes to issuer
+------------------+
|
v
+------------------+
| Issuing Bank | <-- Approves/declines
+------------------+
Trade-offs:
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Lower infrastructure cost | Higher per-transaction fees |
| Faster time-to-market | Extra latency (additional hop) |
| No certification burden | Dependent on upstream processor |
| Focus on merchant UX | Limited control over routing |
Network-Specific Requirements
| Network | Key Protocol | Certification | Special Programs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visa | VisaNet, ISO 8583 variant | Visa Global Acquirer Processing | Visa Token Service (VTS), Visa Direct |
| Mastercard | Banknet, ISO 8583 variant | Mastercard TPP or Member | MDES (tokenization), Mastercard Send |
| American Express | Proprietary (moving to ISO 8583) | OptBlue or Direct | Higher MDR (2.5-3.5%), three-party model |
| Discover | ISO 8583 | Discover Network Alliance | Discover Global Network partnerships |
Major Payment Processors (2025 Landscape)
Fiserv / First Data
History:
- 1971: First Data Corporation founded
- 1980s-2000s: Aggressive acquisition strategy, becomes #1 processor
- 2007: Taken private by KKR for $29B
- 2015: IPO, returns to public markets
- 2019: Fiserv acquires First Data for $22B
Market Position (2025):
- Largest processor by transaction volume (45% of US card transactions)
- Processes 6,000+ transactions per second
- Serves 6 million+ merchant locations
Key Products:
| Product | Description |
|---|---|
| Clover | POS system for SMBs, competes with Square |
| Carat | Omnichannel commerce platform for enterprise |
| North | Traditional enterprise acquiring |
| Star Network | 4th largest US debit network |
PayFac Relevance: Many PayFacs use Fiserv/First Data. Offers PayFac-in-a-Box solutions and sponsor bank introductions.
Global Payments / Worldpay (Post-2025 Deal)
Corporate History:
- Global Payments: Spun out from National Data Corp (2001), acquired TSYS (2019) for $21.5B
- TSYS: Founded 1959, leader in issuer processing, 40% of US card issuing market
- Worldpay: Founded 1989, spun out from RBS (2010), acquired by FIS (2019) for $43B
2025 Mega-Deal:
- Global Payments acquiring Worldpay from GTCR for $22.7B
- Global Payments selling TSYS/Issuer Solutions to FIS for $13.5B
- Becoming pure-play merchant acquirer with global scale
Market Position (Post-2025):
- 2nd largest merchant acquirer globally
- Processes $4 trillion+ annually
- Strong in: Integrated software, vertical SaaS, e-commerce
PayFac Relevance: Major provider for PayFac platforms. Worldpay has strong PayFac-as-a-Service offering.
FIS (Post-Worldpay Exit)
History:
- 1968: Founded as Systematics
- 2019: Acquires Worldpay for $43B - THE BIG BET
- 2024: Sells 55% Worldpay stake to GTCR for $18.5B (implies ~$34B total valuation) - ADMITTED FAILURE
- 2025: Announced acquisition of TSYS/Issuer Solutions from GPN for $13.5B (pending close)
The Worldpay Failure - What Happened:
- Cultural clash between FIS (bank software) and Worldpay (payments)
- Worldpay lost market share to Stripe, Adyen, Shopify
- Technology modernization stalled
- FIS paid $43B in 2019, sold 55% stake at implied
$34B total valuation in 2024 ($9B+ loss)
Post-2025 Strategy: Refocusing on core strength: ISSUER PROCESSING
- #1 in issuer processing (manages 3 billion+ cards)
- #1 in bank core systems (7,000+ bank clients)
- Exiting merchant acquiring
Key Lesson: Just because you're big doesn't mean you can succeed in every payments vertical. Merchant acquiring requires different DNA than issuer processing.
Bank-Owned Processors
Chase Paymentech (JPMorgan Chase)
- Position: 4th largest US processor
- Strength: Vertical integration (bank + processor + treasury services)
- Focus: Enterprise merchants, Chase banking clients
- PayFac Use: Can act as sponsor bank + processor (one-stop shop)
Elavon (US Bank subsidiary)
- Position: 5th largest US processor
- Strength: International reach (strong in Europe, Canada)
- Focus: Mid-market merchants
- PayFac Use: Offers PayFac solutions via US Bank sponsorship
Why Banks Own Processors:
| Advantages | Challenges |
|---|---|
| Vertical integration (deposits + acquiring) | Bank compliance culture slows innovation |
| No sponsor bank fees | Risk-averse (won't serve high-risk) |
| Regulatory licenses in place | Often lag in technology |
Fintech Processors: Adyen & Stripe
Adyen
Founded: 2006 in Amsterdam
Unique Model:
- Built full-stack from scratch (no legacy systems)
- Single platform for all channels (online, in-store, mobile)
- Direct network certifications (250+ payment methods)
- Own payment terminals (hardware + software)
Market Position:
- Processes EUR 500B+ annually
- Enterprise focus (Uber, Spotify, Microsoft, eBay)
Strengths:
- True omnichannel (one platform, all channels)
- Transparent pricing (interchange++)
- High authorization rates (smart routing)
- Modern tech stack (built for cloud)
PayFac Relevance: Offers "Platforms" solution for PayFac model. Used by Uber, Shopify, DoorDash.
Stripe
Founded: 2010 by Collison brothers
Unique Model:
- Developer-first approach (7 lines of code to accept payments)
- PayFac model from day 1 (instant merchant onboarding)
- Initially used third-party processors, now direct connections
- Expanded to full financial services (Treasury, Issuing)
Market Position:
- Processes $1 trillion+ annually
- Millions of businesses (long tail + enterprise)
- Dominant in tech/SaaS/startups
Strengths:
- Easiest integration (best developer experience)
- Instant onboarding (Express, Connect for platforms)
- Global reach (46+ countries)
- Continuous innovation
PayFac Relevance: Stripe Connect is the PayFac platform leader. Powers thousands of SaaS platforms.
Why Adyen & Stripe Are Winning
| Factor | Legacy Processors | Fintech Processors |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | Legacy mainframes | Modern cloud platforms |
| Developer Experience | Complex integrations | Easy APIs |
| Pricing | Hidden fees | Transparent pricing |
| Innovation Speed | Multi-year cycles | Quarterly releases |
| Global Coverage | Fragmented regional | Single platform for all markets |
| Mindset | Bank/ISO legacy thinking | Merchant-first |
Payment Gateway vs Payment Processor
This is a common point of confusion:
Payment Gateway
Definition: Technology platform that accepts, encrypts, and routes payment information. Modern gateways provide merchant-facing APIs, tokenization, fraud screening, and can route to multiple processors.
Function:
- Collects and encrypts customer payment data
- Customer-facing interface (APIs, hosted checkout)
- Acts as a bridge between parties
- Modern capabilities: Tokenization/vaulting, fraud screening, routing logic, retry logic, multi-processor orchestration
Examples: Authorize.Net, Braintree, NMI, Spreedly (orchestration), Primer.io
Payment Processor
Definition: Company that facilitates electronic transactions by processing and authorizing payments.
Function:
- Moves money between banks
- Verifies transactions
- Operates on the back end
- Ensures compliance with industry standards
Examples: First Data (Fiserv), Worldpay, Global Payments
Key Differences
| Aspect | Payment Gateway | Payment Processor |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Role | Collects and encrypts data | Moves money, authorizes transactions |
| Position | Customer-facing | Back-end operations |
| Security Function | Encrypts sensitive data | Verifies compliance |
| Services | Secure data transmission | Fraud detection, chargeback management |
| Typical Fees | Monthly fee | Transaction fees |
How They Work Together
Customer enters card info
|
v
+------------------+
| Payment Gateway | <-- Encrypts data
+------------------+
|
v
+------------------+
| Payment Processor| <-- Routes to issuer
+------------------+
|
v
+------------------+
| Issuing Bank | <-- Approves/declines
+------------------+
Do You Need Both? For most businesses, yes. Many modern providers (Stripe, Square, PayPal) bundle both services into one.
Processor Selection Criteria
1. Pricing & Economics
Pricing Models:
| Model | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Interchange-Plus | IC + Network Fees + Processor Markup (e.g., IC + $0.20 + 0.25%) | Mid-large merchants, PayFacs |
| Flat-Rate | Single rate (e.g., 2.9% + $0.30) | Startups, low volume, simplicity |
| Tiered | Qualified/Mid-qualified/Non-qualified buckets | AVOID - predatory pricing |
Key Questions:
- What are per-transaction fees?
- Monthly/annual platform fees?
- Chargeback fees?
- Reserve requirements?
- Volume discounts at what thresholds?
2. Integration Capabilities
Technical Requirements:
- REST API quality (documentation, SDKs, support)
- Webhook reliability (idempotency, retry logic)
- Tokenization/vault options
- PCI scope reduction tools:
- Hosted fields / iframes
- Point-to-point encryption (P2PE) for card-present
- Network tokenization (VTS, MDES)
- Link-based checkout (redirect flows)
- Mobile SDKs (iOS, Android)
- Testing/sandbox environments
PayFac-Specific Needs:
- Sub-merchant onboarding APIs
- Split payment/marketplace functionality
- Automated underwriting hooks
- Payout scheduling flexibility
3. Settlement Timing
| Factor | Consideration |
|---|---|
| Standard funding | T+1 vs T+2 vs T+3 |
| Next-day funding | Available? What fee? |
| Instant payouts | Available? What fee? |
| Reserve release | When are reserves released? |
Why it matters: Cash flow for sub-merchants affects churn.
4. Geographic Coverage
- Domestic-only vs international
- Which countries/currencies supported
- Local acquiring vs cross-border
- Multi-currency settlement options
5. Risk Appetite & Merchant Categories
Processors vary widely in risk tolerance:
| Type | Merchant Categories | Chargeback Tolerance |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative (Banks) | Low-risk only | <0.5% |
| Moderate (First Data, Global Payments) | Most standard MCCs | ~1% |
| Aggressive (High-risk specialists) | CBD, adult, crypto | 2%+ |
Critical: Match processor's risk appetite to your target merchants.
6. Support & Partnership
- Account manager quality
- Technical support responsiveness
- Underwriting team accessibility
- Compliance/legal support
- Roadmap alignment
PayFac Implications
How PayFacs Work with Processors
Sub-Merchant --> PayFac Platform --> Processor --> Card Networks
| |
| |
v v
Master Merchant Sponsor Bank
Account
PayFac Handles:
- Sub-merchant onboarding
- KYC/KYB verification
- Underwriting decisions
- Platform features
- Payout scheduling
- First-line support
- Fraud monitoring
Processor Handles:
- Network connectivity
- Authorization routing
- Settlement/clearing
- Interchange calculation
- Chargeback lifecycle
- PCI infrastructure
Processor vs Sponsor Bank
| Aspect | Sponsor Bank | Processor |
|---|---|---|
| Who | Licensed bank (Chase, Wells Fargo) | Technology company (Stripe, First Data) |
| Role | Master merchant account, regulatory licenses | Technology infrastructure |
| Fees | Platform fee ($50K-$250K+/year) + basis points | Interchange-plus pricing + platform fees |
| What they provide | Licenses, regulatory oversight, reserves | APIs, routing, settlement, reporting |
Bundled vs Separate:
- Bundled: Chase Paymentech (processor + bank in one) - simpler but locked in
- Separate: Stripe (processor) + Wells Fargo (sponsor) - flexible but two relationships
Why Processor Choice Matters for PayFacs
- You can't easily switch - Integration takes months; this is a 5-10 year decision
- Processor limits = your limits - Geographic reach, MCCs, funding speed all constrained
- Processor economics = your economics - Small fee changes = big margin impact
- Uptime is your reputation - If processor goes down, YOU look bad
- Compliance risk is shared - If they lose certification, your platform shuts down
Processing Agreement Key Terms
Pay attention to:
- Pricing & fee escalation provisions
- Reserve requirements and release terms
- Termination clauses (notice period, early termination fees)
- Data portability (can you export your data?)
- SLAs with financial penalties
- Liability caps
- Volume commitments and minimums
Red Flags:
- "Qualified/Non-qualified" tiered pricing
- Auto-renewal without opt-out window
- Processor can terminate without cause on 30 days notice
- Huge early termination fees
- No data portability
Processor Economics & Revenue Models
Understanding how processors make money helps you negotiate better and understand their incentives.
Primary Revenue: Processing Margins
Interchange-Plus Model (Most Common for PayFacs):
Processor charges: Interchange + Network Fees + Markup
Example: $100 transaction
- Interchange: $1.80 (goes to issuer)
- Network fees: $0.15 (goes to Visa/MC)
- Processor markup: $0.30 (processor keeps)
- Merchant pays: $2.25 total
Blended/Flat-Rate Model (Stripe, Square):
- Processor charges fixed % (e.g., 2.9% + $0.30)
- Processor keeps difference between their rate and actual costs
- Higher margin for processor, simpler for merchant
Secondary Revenue Streams
| Revenue Stream | Description | Typical Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly fees | Platform, gateway, PCI compliance | $10-$100/month |
| Chargeback fees | Per-chargeback handling fee | $15-$25 per dispute |
| International fees | Currency conversion markup | 1-3% above mid-market |
| Premium features | Instant payouts, advanced fraud tools | 0.5-1.5% per payout |
| Hardware revenue | Terminals, card readers | $50-$500 per device |
Volume Economics
Processors have high fixed costs (infrastructure, compliance) and low marginal costs:
- Break-even: Typically $5-10B annual processing volume
- Profitable scale: $50B+ annually
- This is why consolidation happens - scale is survival
Authorization Rate Optimization
Why This Matters: Authorization rate directly impacts revenue. A 2-5% difference in approval rates can mean millions in additional or lost revenue.
Industry Benchmarks
| Transaction Type | Average Auth Rate | Top Performers |
|---|---|---|
| Card-present (CP) | 95-98% | 98%+ |
| Card-not-present (CNP) | 80-85% | 87-90%+ |
| Recurring/subscription | 85-90% | 92%+ |
What Drives Higher Auth Rates
- Direct network connections - Fewer hops = faster authorization
- Smart retry logic - Automatic retry with different parameters
- Network tokenization - Visa/MC tokens update automatically
- 3DS optimization - Reduce friction while maintaining compliance
- Account Updater - Automatically update expired cards
- Machine learning - Predict and avoid soft declines
Revenue Impact Example
PayFac processes $1B annually
Auth rate: 85% vs 90% = 5% difference
5% of $1B = $50M in additional approved volume
At 2.5% take rate = $1.25M additional revenue
Key Point: Authorization rate should be a key processor selection criterion for PayFacs.
Market Landscape Summary (2025)
| Processor | Market Position | Strength | PayFac Offering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiserv/First Data | #1 (45% US) | Scale, full-stack | PayFac-in-a-Box |
| Global Payments/Worldpay | #2 globally | International, vertical SaaS | PayFac-as-a-Service |
| FIS | #1 issuer processing | Bank software | Exiting merchant acquiring |
| Chase Paymentech | #4 US | Bank integration | Bundled processor + sponsor |
| Elavon | #5 US | International | PayFac via US Bank |
| Adyen | Enterprise leader | True omnichannel | Platforms solution |
| Stripe | Developer leader | APIs, instant onboarding | Stripe Connect |
Self-Assessment Questions & Answers
Question 9: A merchant says they use "Stripe for payments." What roles is Stripe actually playing?
Answer:
Stripe is playing multiple roles simultaneously:
- Payment Gateway - Provides APIs and hosted checkout to collect card data
- Payment Processor - Routes authorization requests to card networks
- Payment Facilitator (PayFac) - Acts as master merchant, onboards sub-merchants instantly
- Acquirer-lite - Works with sponsor banks but handles acquirer-like functions
Key Point: Modern fintechs like Stripe have vertically integrated the payment stack. The merchant says "Stripe" but they're actually using:
- Stripe's APIs (gateway function)
- Stripe's direct network connections (processor function)
- Stripe's master merchant account (PayFac function)
- Stripe's sponsor bank relationships (acquiring function)
This is why Stripe can onboard merchants instantly - they ARE the PayFac, not just a processor.
Question 12: What is the key difference between a payment gateway and a payment processor?
Answer:
| Aspect | Payment Gateway | Payment Processor |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Function | Securely collects and transmits payment data | Routes transactions and moves money between banks |
| Position in Flow | Customer-facing, front-end | Back-end, between gateway and card networks |
| What It Does | Encrypts card data, sends to processor | Authorizes transactions, handles settlement |
| Security Role | Protects data in transit | Ensures compliance, fraud detection |
| Examples | Authorize.Net, Braintree (standalone) | First Data (Fiserv), TSYS, Worldpay |
Analogy:
- Gateway = The secure mailroom that receives and packages letters
- Processor = The postal system that actually delivers the letters
Modern Reality: Many providers (Stripe, Adyen, Square) bundle both into one service, which is why the distinction can be confusing. But understanding the difference helps when architecting payment systems or negotiating contracts.
Key Takeaways
-
Processors are the plumbing - They're the technical infrastructure connecting merchants to card networks
-
Front-end != Back-end - Authorization routing is different from settlement/clearing
-
Direct network connections are expensive - Certification costs millions and takes years
-
The industry is consolidating - 2019-2025 saw massive M&A reshaping the landscape
-
Fintechs are disrupting - Stripe and Adyen built modern platforms and are eating market share
-
For PayFacs, processor choice is critical - You're locked in for years; their capabilities become yours
-
Gateway != Processor - Gateways collect data; processors route transactions and move money
-
Sponsor bank != Processor - Banks provide licenses and accounts; processors provide technology
-
The FIS/Worldpay failure teaches - Not all payments businesses are the same; $43B can disappear
-
Read the fine print - Processing agreements have gotchas in termination, reserves, and SLAs
References
Market Research & Industry Analysis
- Payments Dive - Fiserv takes lead back from FIS - Market share analysis
- Nilson Report - Industry publication tracking payment card statistics
- CardRates - Credit Card Processors Market Share 2025 - Processor rankings
Recent M&A Activity
- American Banker - Global Payments divests issuer business to FIS - 2025 deal coverage
- FIS Press Release - Worldpay Stake Sale and TSYS Acquisition
- Business Wire - Global Payments Worldpay Acquisition - Official announcement
Gateway vs Processor Education
- Stripe - Payment processor vs payment gateway - Clear explanation
- Shopify - Payment Gateway vs Payment Processor - E-commerce perspective
- Tipalti - Gateway vs Processor - Business finance view
Processor Technical Information
- Finix - The Payment Processing Players - Processor landscape
- EMS Corporate - Front-End vs Back-End Processing - Technical breakdown
- Green Sheet - What does a processor do? - Industry perspective
Network Requirements
- Visa Core Rules - Official Visa rulebook
- Mastercard Rules - Mastercard standards
Related Topics
| Topic | Description |
|---|---|
| The Four-Party Model | Interchange economics and fee structures |
| Card Network Role | BIN routing and network certifications |
| Transaction Lifecycle | Authorization, settlement, and chargebacks |
| Debit Networks & Routing | Processor-owned networks (STAR, NYCE) |
| Payment Gateways | Gateway vs processor distinction |
| Acquiring Banks | Sponsor banks and processor relationships |
| ISOs | ISO/processor distribution model |
| ISVs | PayFac model and embedded payments |